CBT-LLM: Enhancing Psychological Support with Large Language Models

Keskeiset käsitteet

Enhancing psychological support through large language models tailored for Cognitive Behavioral Therapy techniques.

Tiivistelmä

1. Introduction

   • AI advancements in mental health support.
   • Challenges in data quality and scarcity.
   • Introduction of CBT-LLM for structured responses.

2. Related Work

   • Overview of counseling techniques like CBT, ACT, DBT.
   • LLMs' role in mental health support.

3. Methodology

   • Problem definition using PsyQA dataset.
   • Generation of CBT responses based on prompts.

4. Data Extraction

   • "The recent advancements in artificial intelligence highlight the potential of language models in psychological health support."
   • "Empirical evaluations demonstrate that CBT-LLM excels in generating structured, professional, and highly relevant responses."

5. Quotations

   • "For many people socializing is an important need and for you it has been a year since you have socialized and this can make you feel very depressed and lonely."

6. Experiment

   • Data preparation and baselines for evaluation.

7. Main Results

   • CBT-LLM outperforms benchmark models like LLaMA-Chinese-7B and Alpaca-Chinese-7B.

8. Human Evaluation

   • Baichuan-7B marginally outperforms Alpaca-Chinese-7B in relevance, structure adherence, and helpfulness measures.

9. Case Study

   • Example response addressing social isolation concerns using CBT principles.

10. Conclusions and Future Work

    • Bridging LLMs with CBT for enhanced mental health support.

11. Limitations

    • Lack of well-defined annotations for cognitive distortions may impact response accuracy.

12. Ethical Statement

    • Release of datasets for research purposes only to protect privacy.

13. Acknowledgements

    • Recognition to evaluators, contributors, and dataset providers.

Tilastot

"The recent advancements in artificial intelligence highlight the potential of language models in psychological health support."
"Empirical evaluations demonstrate that CBT-LLM excels in generating structured, professional, and highly relevant responses."

Lainaukset

"For many people socializing is an important need and for you it has been a year since you have socialized and this can make you feel very depressed and lonely."

Tärkeimmät oivallukset

CBT-LLM

by Hongbin Na klo arxiv.org 03-26-2024

https://arxiv.org/pdf/2403.16008.pdf

Syvällisempiä Kysymyksiä

How can integrating other therapy methodologies like ACT or DBT enhance the effectiveness of the model?

Integrating other therapy methodologies like Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) or Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT) alongside Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) can significantly enhance the effectiveness of the model in several ways. Firstly, each therapy approach brings unique strategies and techniques to address different aspects of mental health issues. By incorporating elements from ACT, which focuses on psychological flexibility and values-based living, the model can help individuals embrace present experiences while aligning their actions with personal values. Similarly, integrating DBT techniques that combine cognitive-behavioral strategies with mindfulness practices can aid in improving emotional regulation and interpersonal effectiveness.
Furthermore, by combining these approaches, the model can offer a more comprehensive and holistic therapeutic experience for users. Different individuals may resonate better with specific therapy modalities based on their preferences and needs. Therefore, having a diverse range of therapeutic techniques integrated into the model allows for personalized support tailored to individual requirements.
Overall, integrating multiple therapy methodologies broadens the scope of interventions available through the model, enhancing its versatility in addressing various mental health concerns effectively.

What are the implications of delivering the entire CBT process in one response on user experience?

Delivering the entire Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) process in one response could have both positive and negative implications on user experience.
On one hand, providing a comprehensive overview of CBT principles within a single response offers users structured guidance that covers all essential components such as validation/empathy, identification of key thoughts/beliefs, posing challenges/reflections, providing strategies/insights, and offering encouragement/foresight. This approach ensures that users receive a well-rounded understanding of how CBT operates within a therapeutic context.
However, there are potential drawbacks to delivering an entire CBT process in one response. The condensed format may overwhelm some users who prefer information presented gradually or segmented into smaller parts for easier digestion. Complex concepts inherent to CBT might be challenging for users to absorb fully in one reading session without time for reflection or discussion.
Moreover, presenting too much information at once could lead to cognitive overload or confusion among users unfamiliar with CBT principles. It might hinder engagement if users feel inundated with content they cannot process effectively within a single interaction.
In conclusion,
while delivering
the complete
CBT process
in one response
offers comprehensiveness,
it is crucial
to consider user preferences,
cognitive load limitations,
and potential impact on engagement when designing such interactions.

How might lack guided annotation framework affect accuracy cognitive distortions identified by themodel?

The lack
of
a guided annotation framework
can significantly impact
the accuracy
of identifying cognitive distortions by
the model.
Guided annotations provide clear guidelines
for categorizing types
of distortions accurately.
Without this framework,
there is room for subjective interpretation by annotators,
leading to inconsistencies
in labeling distortions across data samples.
This inconsistency may result inaccurate training signals being fed back into themodel during fine-tuning processes.
As a result,the modelemay learn incorrect associations between input patternsand corresponding distortion labels,misaligning its abilityto identify similar patterns infuture instances correctly.
Additionally,lackguidedannotationsmay introduce biasintothedatasetifannotatorsinterpretdistortionsdifferentlybasedonpersonal perspectivesorunderstandings.Thisbiascould skewthemode'sperceptionofwhatconstitutesacognitivedistortion,resultingindecreasedaccuracywhenidentifyingtheseerrorsinfutureinputs.Furthermore,inconsistenciesindataannotationmayleadtooverfittingormisclassificationsofdatapatternsbythemodelduringtraining.Thismayresultinpoorerperformancewhengeneralizingtonew,differentinstancesoutsideoftestsetexamples.Inconclusion,astructured,guidedannotationframeworkiscriticalforensuringtheprecisionandreliabilityofcognitivedistortionidentificationbythemodel.Itprovidesclarityandconsistencyinthelabelingprocess,enablingaccuratetrainingandsuperiorperformanceduringmodeldeploymentandinferencephase