insight - Education - # Student-ChatGPT Interaction Dataset

RECIPE4U: Student-ChatGPT Interaction Dataset in EFL Writing Education

Q: Whose responsibility is it to ensure that students do not misuse AI tools like ChatGPT?

In the context of using AI tools like ChatGPT in education, the responsibility for ensuring that students do not misuse these tools lies with a combination of stakeholders. Educators and Institutions: Educators play a crucial role in guiding students on how to use AI tools ethically and effectively. They should provide clear guidelines on the appropriate use of such tools and monitor student interactions to prevent misuse. Developers of AI Tools: The developers of AI tools like ChatGPT also have a responsibility to incorporate features that discourage misuse, such as flagging inappropriate requests or providing educational prompts rather than direct answers. Students Themselves: Students need to be educated on the ethical implications of misusing AI tools and understand their responsibilities when utilizing such technology for academic purposes. Regulatory Bodies: Regulatory bodies may also play a role in setting standards or guidelines for the ethical use of AI in educational settings, holding both educators and developers accountable for promoting responsible usage.

Q: What are the ethical implications of relying heavily on AI for educational tasks?

Relying heavily on artificial intelligence (AI) for educational tasks raises several ethical considerations: Equity and Access: There is a risk that students who do not have access to advanced technology or lack digital literacy skills may be left behind if education becomes too reliant on AI-driven platforms. Privacy Concerns: Using AI often involves collecting large amounts of data about students, raising concerns about data privacy, security, and potential breaches that could compromise sensitive information. Bias and Fairness: If not properly designed and monitored, AI systems can perpetuate biases present in their training data, leading to unfair advantages or disadvantages for certain groups of students. Dependence vs Critical Thinking: Over-reliance on AI may hinder critical thinking skills development among students if they rely solely on automated solutions without engaging deeply with course material. Accountability: Determining accountability becomes complex when decisions are made by algorithms rather than humans; issues arise regarding who is responsible if errors occur due to reliance on faulty algorithms.

Q: How can the findings from this study be applied to improve other areas of education beyond EFL writing?

The findings from this study can be extrapolated and applied across various domains within education: Task-Oriented Dialogue Systems: Insights gained from intent detection models developed in this study can enhance task-oriented dialogue systems used in different subjects where student-AI interactions are prevalent. 2**Student Engagement Strategies: Understanding how EFL learners interact with ChatGPT can inform engagement strategies across disciplines by tailoring content delivery methods based on student preferences identified through interaction patterns. 3**Feedback Mechanisms: Analyzing essay edit patterns provides valuable insights into effective feedback mechanisms which can be implemented across subjects to improve learning outcomes through personalized feedback. 4**Ethical Use Guidelines: Lessons learned about preventing misuse while using ChatGPT can guide educators in establishing ethical guidelines around all forms of technology integration within classrooms regardless

Conceitos essenciais

The author presents RECIPE4U, a dataset from a semester-long experiment with college students in EFL writing courses, focusing on interactions with ChatGPT. The study aims to explore student-ChatGPT interaction patterns and potential applications for educational frameworks.

Resumo

RECIPE4U is a dataset sourced from an experiment with college students engaging with ChatGPT for essay revision. It includes conversation logs, intent labels, satisfaction ratings, and essay edit histories. The study delves into the integration of LLMs in education and analyzes student-AI interaction patterns.

Key points:

RECIPE4U dataset derived from an experiment with college students in EFL writing courses.
Includes conversation logs, intent labels, satisfaction ratings, and essay edit histories.
Focuses on exploring student-ChatGPT interaction patterns and potential educational applications.

Personalizar Resumo

Reescrever com IA

Gerar Citações

Traduzir Fonte

Para outro idioma

Gerar Mapa Mental

do conteúdo fonte

Visitar Fonte

arxiv.org

Estatísticas

During the study, 212 college students engaged in dialogues with ChatGPT.
RECIPE4U contains 4330 utterances including both student and ChatGPT responses.
Students' self-rated satisfaction levels were collected on a five-Likert scale.
The dataset includes 1913 utterance-level essay edit histories.

Citações

"We release RECIPE4U (RECIPE for University) dataset."
"Students interacted with ChatGPT to revise their essays."
"RECIPE4U provides insights into the incorporation of LLMs in educational frameworks."

Principais Insights Extraídos De

RECIPE4U

by Jieun Han,Ha... às arxiv.org 03-14-2024

https://arxiv.org/pdf/2403.08272.pdf

Perguntas Mais Profundas

Whose responsibility is it to ensure that students do not misuse AI tools like ChatGPT?

In the context of using AI tools like ChatGPT in education, the responsibility for ensuring that students do not misuse these tools lies with a combination of stakeholders.

Educators and Institutions: Educators play a crucial role in guiding students on how to use AI tools ethically and effectively. They should provide clear guidelines on the appropriate use of such tools and monitor student interactions to prevent misuse.

Developers of AI Tools: The developers of AI tools like ChatGPT also have a responsibility to incorporate features that discourage misuse, such as flagging inappropriate requests or providing educational prompts rather than direct answers.

Students Themselves: Students need to be educated on the ethical implications of misusing AI tools and understand their responsibilities when utilizing such technology for academic purposes.

Regulatory Bodies: Regulatory bodies may also play a role in setting standards or guidelines for the ethical use of AI in educational settings, holding both educators and developers accountable for promoting responsible usage.

What are the ethical implications of relying heavily on AI for educational tasks?

Relying heavily on artificial intelligence (AI) for educational tasks raises several ethical considerations:

Equity and Access: There is a risk that students who do not have access to advanced technology or lack digital literacy skills may be left behind if education becomes too reliant on AI-driven platforms.

Privacy Concerns: Using AI often involves collecting large amounts of data about students, raising concerns about data privacy, security, and potential breaches that could compromise sensitive information.

Bias and Fairness: If not properly designed and monitored, AI systems can perpetuate biases present in their training data, leading to unfair advantages or disadvantages for certain groups of students.

Dependence vs Critical Thinking: Over-reliance on AI may hinder critical thinking skills development among students if they rely solely on automated solutions without engaging deeply with course material.

Accountability: Determining accountability becomes complex when decisions are made by algorithms rather than humans; issues arise regarding who is responsible if errors occur due to reliance on faulty algorithms.

How can the findings from this study be applied to improve other areas of education beyond EFL writing?

The findings from this study can be extrapolated and applied across various domains within education:

Task-Oriented Dialogue Systems: Insights gained from intent detection models developed in this study can enhance task-oriented dialogue systems used in different subjects where student-AI interactions are prevalent.

2**Student Engagement Strategies: Understanding how EFL learners interact with ChatGPT can inform engagement strategies across disciplines by tailoring content delivery methods based on student preferences identified through interaction patterns.
3**Feedback Mechanisms: Analyzing essay edit patterns provides valuable insights into effective feedback mechanisms which can be implemented across subjects to improve learning outcomes through personalized feedback.
4**Ethical Use Guidelines: Lessons learned about preventing misuse while using ChatGPT can guide educators in establishing ethical guidelines around all forms of technology integration within classrooms regardless